Shocking Confession in Import Bribery Trial
MediaBantenCyber.co.id – (MBC) Bagta, the trial of the alleged import bribery case of IDR 61 billion at the Central Jakarta Corruption Court has once again opened up the internal wounds of Customs and Excise. Witness Sisprian Subiaksono, former Head of Intelligence Sub-Directorate, P2 Directorate, on Wednesday (10/6/2026), admitted that there was management of “operational funds” that could not be accounted for administratively by the state.
Case No. 19/Pid.Sus-TPK/2026/PN / Jkt.Pst with Chief Judge Brelly Yuniar Dien and Public Prosecutor M. Takdir.
*There are funds outside DIPA, originating from the remaining budget*
Under oath, Sisprian confirmed that there were two types of funds: official DOK VAT funds from DIPA, and internal operational funds.
_”There are official DOK VAT funds and there are operational funds that cannot actually be accounted for,”_ said the witness.
He explained that the source of operational funds came from the remaining DIPA budget, including excess funds for official travel and certain activities which were then “shifted”.
_”Permits, initially from DIPA funds in the form of DOK VAT and SPPD. If there are funds that cannot be accounted for or are more accountable, we will shift them to operational funds,” he said.
The funds are used for urgent conditions that require a quick response.
Instructions: Do not keep unknown funds in the office
The most crucial confession: Sisprian admitted that he had ordered his subordinates not to keep unaccountable funds in the office.
_”I say that funds that cannot be accounted for should not be left in the office,”_ he said.
The reason is that intelligence work rooms are often the target of searches by law enforcement officers.
_”I said that our room is often searched, so don’t let there be funds that cannot be accounted for according to DIPA in this room,” he said.
The witness confirmed that his office had been searched by the Attorney General’s Office and the Corruption Eradication Committee.
The conclusion of the session, from Sisprian’s statement, it was revealed that there were fund management practices outside the official state accountability mechanism. Funds sourced from the remaining DIPA were used for “urgent” operations, and were deliberately not kept in the office to avoid searches.
This confession adds to the list of odd facts in the BluRay Cargo Group import bribery trial. The Panel of Judges will investigate where the operational funds are used. (Rud)
PakarPBN
A Private Blog Network (PBN) is a collection of websites that are controlled by a single individual or organization and used primarily to build backlinks to a “money site” in order to influence its ranking in search engines such as Google. The core idea behind a PBN is based on the importance of backlinks in Google’s ranking algorithm. Since Google views backlinks as signals of authority and trust, some website owners attempt to artificially create these signals through a controlled network of sites.
In a typical PBN setup, the owner acquires expired or aged domains that already have existing authority, backlinks, and history. These domains are rebuilt with new content and hosted separately, often using different IP addresses, hosting providers, themes, and ownership details to make them appear unrelated. Within the content published on these sites, links are strategically placed that point to the main website the owner wants to rank higher. By doing this, the owner attempts to pass link equity (also known as “link juice”) from the PBN sites to the target website.
The purpose of a PBN is to give the impression that the target website is naturally earning links from multiple independent sources. If done effectively, this can temporarily improve keyword rankings, increase organic visibility, and drive more traffic from search results.
